Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVickers, David M.
dc.contributor.authorAnonychuk, Andrea M.
dc.contributor.authorDe Wals, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorDemarteau, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorBauch, Chris T.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-18 20:30:36 (GMT)
dc.date.available2018-04-18 20:30:36 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/13124
dc.description.abstractObjective: Advisory committees in Canada and the United States have updated recommendations for quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines against serogroups A, C, W135, and Y. Our objective was to evaluate optimally effective meningococcal vaccination policies using a stochastic dynamic model. Canada was used as an example. Methods: Our stochastic dynamic model of Neisseria meningitidis (Nm) transmission in an age-structured population assumed partial cross-immunity among two aggregated serogroup categories: 'AWY' containing A, W135, and Y; and 'Other' containing B, C, and ungroupable types. We compared the impact of monovalent C versus quadrivalent ACWY vaccination on Nm carriage and invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Our model was parameterized with Canadian epidemiological and demographic data and employed probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Routine infant immunization at 12 months and boosting at 15 years with a quadrivalent vaccine is projected to have the largest impact on total IMD incidence: a 74% reduction over 40 years. Routine infant immunization with a monovalent vaccine at 12 months only has much less impact and also generates strain replacement appearing after approximately ten years of continuous use. Conclusions: Immunizing infants at 12 months and boosting adolescents at 15 years with an ACWY vaccine is predicted to be most effective at reducing IMD incidence.en
dc.description.sponsorshipGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SAen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/*
dc.subjectDynamic modelen
dc.subjectNeisseria meningitidisen
dc.subjectMeningococcal vaccinesen
dc.subjectInvasive meningococcal diseaseen
dc.subjectImmunization programsen
dc.subjectStochastic modelen
dc.subjectStrain replacementen
dc.titleEvaluation Of Serogroup C And Acwy Meningococcal Vaccine Programs: Projected Impact On Disease Burden According To A Stochastic Two-Strain Dynamic Modelen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVickers, D. M., Anonychuk, A. M., De Wals, P., Demarteau, N., & Bauch, C. T. (2015). Evaluation of serogroup C and ACWY meningococcal vaccine programs: Projected impact on disease burden according to a stochastic two-strain dynamic model. Vaccine, 33(1), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.034en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Mathematicsen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Applied Mathematicsen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 Unported

UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages