Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGriem, Dennis 14:53:01 (GMT) 14:53:01 (GMT)
dc.description.abstractThe final chapter of Spinoza’s Ethics has elicited numerous interpretations, and in this work, I discuss Jonathan Bennett’s and Harry Wolfson’s. Bennett claims that the doctrine of blessedness is unintelligible, while Wolfson claims that Spinoza’s account of blessedness actually defends traditional, medieval views of the immortality of the soul. I find neither of these acceptable accounts for the reasons presented below, and I have a simple alternative explanation for this doctrine. Essentially, I argue that by ‘blessedness’ Spinoza means being happy with being virtuous. In my reading of the Ethics, Spinoza first offers the account that we should help others in order to help ourselves, and then he explains that we should enjoy doing so, and he writes that being happy with this is called ‘blessedness.’en
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectSpinoza's Ethicsen
dc.subjectSpinoza's Ethics Part 5en
dc.subjectJonathan Bennetten
dc.subjectEdwin Curleyen
dc.subjectThe third kind of knowledgeen
dc.subjectThe intellectual love of Goden
dc.subjectThe eternity of the minden
dc.subjectVirtue and Power in Spinozaen
dc.titleThe Episodic Nature of "Blessedness" in Spinoza's Ethicsen
dc.typeMaster Thesisen
uws-etd.degreeMaster of Artsen

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages